Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Lydia Wanjiru Munyoro v Alex Ndungutse

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH CORUT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL CASE NO. 2832 OF 1996 LYDIA WANJIRU MUNYORO …………………………. PLAITNIFF VERSUS ALEX NDUNGUTSE ………………………………. DEFENDANT RULING The advocate for the plaintiff explained to this court in his submission and application that prayed for the reinstatement of this suit, that the said suit was not originally on the running down call over. That indeed the suit was listed in the main call over and confirmed in his absence. That thereafter the case was listed before another judge not dealing with running down matters. He then attended to the chambers only to find that the said case was listed before those chambers and this court. He was unable to address the court as he was not robbed. The suit was duly dismissed for non-attendance. He had left his clients else where and they were not in court. He prays the suit be reinstated and an early date be taken From the explanation given by the advocate on the events of the day it seems clearly that there was some confusion as to the listing on the cause list. He attended to a hearing that indicated the hearing would be done in chambers by a judge who did not deal with running down matters. It is trite that where the hearing is of a case or a notice of motion it ought to be conducted in open court unless otherwise directed. The advocate was not able to know which court to attend to. During this process this suit was dismissed. I hereby use my discretion in the light of this confusion that the said advocate encountered. I hereby allow the application to reinstate this suit in the interest of justice. Obiter dictum I wish to just state that where an advocate goes to open court and a judge is duly robbed, the said advocate is not permitted to address the court unless he is robbed. Cases involving a full hearing and the hearing of notice of motions in civil matters are held in open court. This practice was once lost in our courts but with the new reforms and changes, it is hopped that the

page 1 of 2

dignity of the court will return in hearing matters in open court. The costs will be in the cause. Dated this 23rd day of April, 2004 at Nairobi. M.A ANG’AWA JUDGE Mathenge & Muchemi Co. Advocates for the plaitnfif Mungai & Gakuru advocates for the defendant

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.