Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Eliud Kamau Njoroge v Republic

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NYERI CRIMINAL APPEAL CASE NO. 486 OF 2002 ELIUD KAMAU NJOROGE……………………………..…………….APPELLANT Versus REPUBLIC………………………………………………….………….RESPONDENT (Appeal against conviction and sentence by Abdul El Kindly, Principal Magistrate, dated 30 th September 2002, in the Senior Principal Magistrate’s Court at Murang’a Criminal Case No. 1889 of 2001) JUDGMENT The Appellant faced three counts of robbery with violence contrary to Section 296(2) of the Penal Code and was prosecuted, convicted and sentenced to death on each count. He appealed and during the hearing of his appeal before us, the learned Provincial State Counsel, Mr. Orinda, conceded the appeal pointing out that the trial of the Appellant was a nullity because prosecution was conducted by a prosecutor who was not qualified to prosecute in terms of Section 85(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. Mr. Orinda added that he was not asking for a retrial. From record of proceedings before the trial magistrate, there is no dispute that prosecution of the Appellant was done by Police Inspector Kathara and Police Constable Machuki alternatively. The latter was the prosecutor who was not qualified and the prosecution he conducted was substantial in the trial. No doubt the trial thereby became a nullity. Accordingly, we do hereby allow the Appellant’s appeal. Quash his conviction on each count and set aside the sentence thereof. We do order that the Appellant be released forthwith unless lawfully detained in some other cause. Dated this 8th day of November 2004. J. M. KHAMONI JUDGE H. M. OKWENGU JUDGE

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.