REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAKURU CIVIL CASE NO. 176 OF 2000 CECILIA MURUGI MBUTHI……………………………………..……..PLAINTIFF VERSUS NDERITU WAHOME KABIRU……….……………………….………DEFENDANT JUDGMENT In this matter, the Plaintiff’s advocate has made four consecutive applications for adjournment saying that he had not been able to serve a hearing notice upon the Land Registrar, Nyandarua. The parties had, way back on 3rd October, 2000 agreed by consent that all the matters in dispute be referred to the said Land Registrar who was to do the boundary determination between L. R. NO. NYANDARUA/GILGIL/WEST/308 and NYANDARUA/MAWINGO SALIENT/115 and prepare a report. He was supposed to have filed the same within 60 days from 3rd October, 2000. The time was extended to 5/3/2001. Upto date nothing has been done and the Plaintiff’s advocate has never explained to the court why he cannot serve the Land Registrar so that he can do the needful. The Plaintiff and her advocate are not interested in pursuing this matter and the same is dismissed with costs for want of prosecution. DATED, SIGNED & DELIVERED at Nakuru this 26th day of November, 2004. DANIEL MUSINGA AG. JUDGE 26/11/2004
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.