Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Michael Kipchirchir Cheboi Moses Kiptoo Cheboi v Republic

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAKURU CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 138 OF 2004 MICHAEL KIPCHIRCHIR CHEBOI MOSES KIPTOO CHEBOI…………………………………………….……..……………APPLICANTS VERSUS REPUBLIC………………………………………………..……..…….RESPONDENT RULING The Applicants, Michael Kipchirchir Cheboi and Moses Kiptoo Cheboi were charged before the Chief Magistrate’s Court Nakuru with the offence of robbery with violence contrary to Section 296(1) of the Penal Code in Nakuru CMC CRC No. 2200 of 2004 Republic –versus- Michael Kipchirchir Cheboi and Moses Kiptoo Cheboi. They have now made an application before this court seeking the orders of the Court that the Criminal Case facing them be heard and determined at Eldoret. They contend that the alleged offence was committed within the jurisdiction of the Chief Magistrate’s Court, Eldoret. I have perused the charge sheet. I have noted that the offence was allegedly committed at Chelelek Village, Koibatek District. According to Gazette Notice No. 7931 of the 8th of October 2004, Kenya Gazette which was issued by the Honourable Chief Justice, all offences committed within Koibatek District are to be heard by the Chief Magistrate’s Court Eldoret, under the supervision of the High Court sitting at Eldoret. In the circumstances of this case I do find that the Applicant’s application has merit. Mr Koech, Learned State Counsel did not oppose the application provided that the Court confirmed that the alleged offence was committed within the jurisdiction of the Chief Magistrate’s Court sitting at Eldoret. I have perused the file and I am satisfied that this case ought to be heard and disposed of by the Chief Magistrate, Eldoret. I therefore order Nakuru CMCRC No. 2200 of 2004 involving the Applicants to be transferred to Eldoret for hearing and disposal by the Chief Magistrate, Eldoret. It is so ordered. DATED at NAKURU this 3rd day of December, 2004. L. KIMARU AG. JUDGE

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.