REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI Civil Appeal 1564 of 1998 BERNARD MWANGI WAWERU……………………………………….PLAINTIFF VERSUS NAFTAL MAINA GATHIARI……………………….……………1ST DEFENDANT ERNEST NGONGO MWATI……………………………………..2ND DEFENDANT RULING The applicant applies to stay execution of an order whereby the Applicant’s objection to the attachment of their motor vehicles was dismissed. The Applicants in their affidavits claim that they will suffer substantial loss as in the event that the appeal succeeds they will not be able to recover the motor vehicles from the Respondents which are the means of livelihood. There is no evidence that the respondent is a man of straw. In the circumstances l will grant a stay on condition that the Applicants jointly and severally pay into an interest bearing account a sum of Kshs 700,000 to be held in the joint names of the advocates pending the determination of the appeal. The payment to be made within 14 days. DATED AND DELIVERED THIS 4TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2004 PHILLIP J RANSLEY JUDGE
Original judgment
Bernard Mwangi Waweru v Naftal Maina Gathiari & 1 other
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.