REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT ELDORET CIVIL CASE NO. 46 OF 1998 NATIONAL BANK OF KENYA LIMITED ………………..…………..………..PLAINTIFF -VERSUS- PAUL KIPTIGIN SITIENEI …………..…….…………..…………………..…. DEFENDANT RULING This case came for hearing on 4th December 2003. While the advocate for the defendant was present, the plaintiff and their advocates were not present. It is obvious from the records that the case was fixed for hearing by the advocate for the plaintiff in the court registry in the absence of the advocate for the defendant. There appears therefore, to be no justification why both the plaintiff and their advocates were absent during the hearing. On that ground of the absence of the plaintiff and their advocates, Mr. Ngigi for the defendant applied to court to dismiss the plaintiff’s suit under Order 9A Rule 4 (1) Civil Procedure Rules. Having perused the Order and Rule, I observe that the court is allowed to dismiss the plaintiff’s suit if the defendant does not admit any part of the claim. In the defence dated 15th May, 1998 and filed on the same date, the defendant does not admit any part of the claim. I therefore dismiss the plaintiff’s case under the powers conferred on me under Order 9B Rule 4 (1) of the Civil Procedure Rules. I award costs of the suit to the defendants. Dated and Delivered at Eldoret this ………… Day of …………….. 2004. George Dulu, Judge
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.