Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Mohammed W. Wasiche v Jenipher A. Odock

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT KAKAMEGA Civil Appeal 3 of 2004 MOHAMMED W. WASICHE .........................................................................PLAINTIFF VERSUS JENIPHER A. ODOCK..............................................................................DEFENDANT RULING In essence, the Applicant, Mohammed W. Wasiche, is seeking an order for extension of limitation period so as to be able to institute suit to seek compensation. He was involved in an accident on 2.11.99 along Kisumu/Kakamega road while travelling as a passenger in motor vehicle reg. No. KAH 418 J which was registered in the name of the Respondent, Jenipher Atieno Odock, as the owenr thereof. He avers that he discovered or found out the identity of the owner of the said motor vehicle about 4 years after the accident that is to say on 15.10.2003. The Applicant avers in his affidavit sworn on 28.12.2003 in support of the application that he gave instructions to his advocates on 1.12.2000. The police abstract seems to have been completed on 11.12.2000. Although it did not have the particulars of the owner. The particulars of the driver of the vehicle were filled in it. An application seems to have been made to the Registrar of Motor vehicles on 27.9.2001 with a view to establish the particulars of the owenr of the motor vehicle. It was not until two years later after that application was made that a reminder was sent on 5.10.2003. There is no explanation why for two years no reminder was sent or other step taken. Even after the particulars were sent regarding the owner of the vehicle, it took more than 2 months to make an application for extension of time. I am satisfied that the requirements of section 28(2) of the Limitation of Actions Act Cap 22 have been complied with. The applicant and his counsel went into a slander. No due diligence was exercised in this case and the application must fail. It is dismissed. Dated at Kakamega this 3rd day of December 2004. G.B.M. KARIUKI JUDGE 3.12.2004 before G.B.M. Kariuki, J Mudoto court clerk Mr. Namatsi for the applicant Ruling read in open court on 3.12.2004. G.B.M. KARIUKI

page 1 of 2

JUDGE 3.12.2004

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.