Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

High Court 133 of 2004

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI (NAIROBI LAW COURTS) Civil Case 1256 of 2002 JOHN OYAWO NEKO AND THREE OTHERS……..................…….PLAINTIFFS -versusUNITY 45 HOUSING CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD. ….…………DEFENDANT RULING The Defendant/Applicant has filed a Chamber Summons dated the 12th January 2004 which was to be heard, inter parties on the 17th February 2004. At such hearing, Mr. Nyakiangana for the Plaintiffs/Respondents sought directions as to whether or not such application was properly before the Court arguing that the orders it seeks have already been granted in a similar application on the 16th July 2003 by Nyamu J and as such order are still subsisting, the subject application is res judicata. Mr. Koge for the Defendant/Applicant in reply contended that the Orders of the 16th July last were pursuant to an Interlocutory Judgment entered on the 5th July 2003 and were subsequently vacated by Visram J on the 15th January 2004 following the Plaintiffs’ successful application setting aside the Interlocutory Judgment. Having perused both Orders in conjunction with the record, I am satisfied that the Order of the 15th January 2004 vacated the earlier ones of the 16th July 2003 the later having in any event been granted ex parte pending, in my view, formal proof or hearing inter parties thereby allowing the parties to go to trial on the issues in this suit. Pending trial the Defendant/Applicant is at liberty to prosecute its said application of the 12th January 2004. Dated and delivered at Nairobi this 24th day of February 2004. P. Kihara Kariuki Ag. Judge

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.