REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT KISUMU CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 321 OF 2002 PETER KIPRUGUT MARITIM ………………………….APPELLANT VERSUS REPUBLIC ………………………………………………..RESPONDENT (Appeal from Original SRM Nyando Criminal Case No. 583 of 2001) JUDGMENT The appellant was charged, tried and convicted of the offence of stealing stock contrary to section 278 of the Penal Code. He has now appealed against his conviction and sentence as indicated by our Mr. Mutai from the state the Court convicted the appellant of the offence by the application of the doctrine of recent possession when the dates of the theft and when he was found with the animals were not before the Court. Secondly the appellant had given explanation of having been found in possession. There was no evidence that Andrea Arap Kirui who had allegedly employed the appellant to drive the animals was interviewed and called as a witness. Bearing those factors in mind I am not satisfied that the prosecution proved its case beyond reasonable doubt. The appeal is therefore allowed and the conviction of the appellant is therefore quashed. The sentence is set aside and it is directed that he be released forthwith. Dated and delivered this 24th October, 2003. B.K. Tanui JUDGE
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.