Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Peter Ndungu Kibunyi v Republic

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 525 OF 2002 From Original Conviction and sentence in Criminal Case No. 204 of 2002 of The Snr. Resident Magistrate’s Court at Kikuyu PETER NDUNGU KIBUNYI…………………………..…….APPELLANT VERSUS REPUBLIC…………………………………………………..RESPONDENT JUDGMENT The appellant pleaded guilty to the offence of stealing from a person c/s 279(a) of The Penal Code and on conviction he was sentenced to 24 months imprisonment with 4 strokes of the cane. This appeal is against sentence only. The appellant was a first offender. The subject mater was kshs. 600/-. He is an orphan. The learned trial magistrate had asked for a probation officers report. This was prepared and presented to the court. However the said report was never referred to by the learned trial magistrate in her note on sentencing. I note that the probation officer’s report was favourable to the appellant and no reason exists why he was not given that chance. From the date he first appeared in court i.e. 12/2/2000 to date the appellant has not been free. He was sentenced on 6th May, 2002 which to date works up to about 8 months. The total period of incaceration is however about one year. I consider this sufficient punishment. Accordingly this appeal is allowed by setting aside the sentence imposed by the learned trial magistrate and substituting the same with the period already served by the appellant. He shall receive one stroke of the cane. Thereafter he shall be released from prison unless otherwise lawfully held. Orders accordingly. Dated and delivered at Nairobi this 29th day of January, 2003. MBOGHOLI MSAGHA JUDGE

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.