Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

High Court 911 of 2003

REPULIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAKURU CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.74 OF 2002 (From original conviction and sentence in Criminal Case No.1930/2000 of the Senior Resident Magistrate’s Court at MOLO –J. KIARIE(S.R.M.) SAMUEL MUTHANDI KURIA…………………….APPELLANT VERSUS REPUBLIC…………………………………………..RESPONDENT JUDGMENT The Appellant, through his Advocate, Miss Njoroge, has appealed against the sentence of 7 years imprisonment passed against him by Molo Senior Resident Magistrate’s Court. He had been charged and convicted of TRAFFICKING IN NARCOTICS DRUGS contrary to Section 4(a) of the Narcotics and Psychotropic Substances Act No.4 of 1994. The Advocate for the Appellant urged the court to find that the sentence of 7 years imprisonment for trafficking in 1933 stones of cannabis sativa was harsh. That the Appellant was a first offender. Was young aged 36 years and had a young wife and children. That the custodial sentence would destroy his life. Counsel for the State did not oppose the appeal against sentence. The offence of trafficking in narcotics drugs is very serious. The impact of the drugs if they got to the public is horrendous especially if the drug got to our educational institutions. The Appellant’s personal inconvenience is far of less importance as the danger the public in general was exposed to and the court has a duty to protect the public. The only reason the court will reduce the sentence is so as to put him at par with his co-accused who was sentenced to six years imprisonment. The Appellant’s sentence is accordingly reduced to six years imprisonment. The appeal succeeds to that extent. Dated and delivered at Nakuru this 13th day of March, 2003. JESSIE LESIIT JUDGE

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.