Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Joseph Abio Galana v Republic

REPULIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MOMBASA CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 28 OF 2003 (IN THE MATTER OF THE INTENDED APPEAL) BETWEEN JOSEPH ABIO GALANA……………………………….. APPELLANT AND REPUBLIC ……………………………………………….. RESPONDENT RULING The Applicant was charged and convicted for the offence of theft by servant and sentenced to serve 2 years imprisonment. He has preferred an appeal and applied to be freed on bond pending the hearing of the said appeal. At the hearing of the said application, the Applicant was not present because the prison authorities at Hola Prison were not able to transfer him to Mombasa due to the heavy rains in the District which have rendered roads impassable. It is for the same reasons that the original court file was said not to be available. Mr. Magolo strongly presented the arguments that the appeal will take long to be heard and the Appellant has a good appeal. The State Counsel however was of the view that the appeal should be set down for hearing. Instead of granting the bond. I have read the proceedings and without pre-emptying the appeal I find there are certain glaring aspects of the evidence that need be considered on appeal. These are discrepancies as to who was in-charge of the Exhibit store and also the time in question the solar panels were indeed stolen if at all. It is with this in mind that I admit the appeal and order that the same be set down for hearing the soonest possible and the original file and Appellant be transferred to Mombasa without further delay. In the circumstances I see no need to grant the bond. It is so ordered. Dated and delivered this 5th day of June 2003. P.M. TUTUI COMMISSIONER OF ASSIZE

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.