Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Criminal Division v Republic & 1 other

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CRIMINAL DIVISION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1128 OF 2001 From Original Conviction and Sentence in Criminal Case No. 535 of 2001 of the SP Magistrate’s Court at Kibera. NELSON MAINA WAFULA……………………………….APPELLANT VERSUS REPUBLIC…………………………………………………..RESPONDENT CONSOLIDATED WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1129 OF 2001 BERNARD MBUCCHE SAFARI………………….…………APPELLANT VERSUS REPUBLIC………………………………………………….RESPONDENT JUDGMENT These appeals were consolidated. The two appellants were convicted of the offence of robbery with violence c/s 296(2) of the Penal code and sentenced to death. When the appeals came up for hearing on 1st April, 2003, the learned counsel for the Republic conceded the same. Consequently, having agreed with the learned counsel for the Republic, we set the appellants free and reserved our reasons for so doing. The offence charged was committed at night. The conviction was based on the evidence of identification by a single witness. The complainant is said to have been aided by the lights of his car to identify the appellants. The intensity of those lights was not known. There was no evidence that connected the two appellants upon which to determine any common intention. There were no recoveries made from either of the two appellants that were incriminating. We agree that the conviction based on the shaky evidence of pw1 was most unsafe. For those reasons the appeals were allowed. Dated and delivered at Nairobi this 5th day of June, 2003 MBOGHOLI MSAGHA JUDGE

page 1 of 2

R. M. MUTITU JUDGE

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.