Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Isaac Kienne Mukwate v Republic

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CRIMINAL APPEAL 419 OF 2000 ISAAC KIENNE MUKWATE………………………….…….APPELLANT VERSUS REPUBLIC……………………………………………..……RESPONDENT JUDGMENT On 6th March, 2003, we allowed the appellant’s appeal against the conviction for the offence of Robbery with violence and set aside the death sentence. We reserved our reasons for agreeing with the learned counsel for the Republic for conceding the appeal. The offence was committed at night. The complainant raised an alarm and neighbours came. Footprints led to the house of the appellant where some rubber shoes were found and believed to have made the foot prints. The ground was wet but there was no mind on the shoes to confirm they had been used to walk over mind. Nevertheless the learned trial magistrate convicted the appellant. With respect, we agreed with the learned counsel for the republic that that evidence was most unsafe upon which to base a conviction that carries a death sentence. For those reasons the appeal was allowed. Dated and delivered at Nairobi this 13th day of May, 2003. A. MBOGHOLI MSAGHA JUDGE R.M MUTITU JUDGE

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.