Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Peter Kiume Kairu & 1 other v Republic

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA ÁT NAKURU CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.51 OF 2003 PETER KIUME KAIRU…………………………...APPLICANT VERSUS REPUBLIC………………………………………RESPONDENT RULING The applicant has applied for bond pending appeal. He has given only one ground to his application that he was hypertensive and was unable to get appropriate treatment. The State has opposed the application. I have considered the application and grounds given. Nothing has been produced to this court to show that the applicant has any condition of hypertension as he has alleged. He brought no document whatsoever to show he has been treated for the condition. Nothing has been produced to show the severity of it or the inability to get adequate treatment. I see no basis upon which to exercise my discretion in deciding whether or not to grant the application. I find applicant made mere allegations that he was hypertensive and that he could not receive adequate treatment while in prison. I find no grounds upon which to grant the bond pending appeal. The application is refused. JESSIE LESIIT JUDGE Read, signed and delivered this 9th day of Juy, 2003. In presence of Mr. Mutuku for State Applicant present in person. JESSIE LESIIT JUDGE

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.