REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL DIVISION CIV APP 717 OF 2001 JOSEPH GIKONYO T/A GARAM INVESTMENTS …………………………… APPELLANT VERSUS GEORGE GAITI T/A URAFIKI TOURS & SAFARIS …………………… RESPONDENT RULING After hearing and recording submissions of counsel for the parties herein, I cannot say the appeal is not arguable or that if the application is not granted the appellant shall not suffer substantial loss given that this is a money decree and that to recover it from a rural folk if the appeal succeeds. Is an-uphill task. I allow this application on condition that the full decretal sum is deposited in an interest earning account at a reputable financing institution in joint names of counsel for both parties within 14 days from today and if the appellant fails to avail the said decretal sum for deposit within the given period, this order to lapse and the respondent to be at liberty to execute. Costs of this application to the respondent in any event. Delivered this 11th day of April, 2002. D.K.S. AGANYANYA JUDGE
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.