Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Harambee Co-operative Society Ltd v Elite Computers Ltd

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL CASE NO. 276 OF 1998 HARAMBEE CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD………….PLAINTIFF VERSUS ELITE COMPUTERS LTD…………………………………DEFENDANT RULING In HCCC No. 279/98 where a similar application was made in a similar suit, I upheld a similar preliminary objection. I held in part: “Since there is no decree in existence the objection proceeding under Order XXI Civil Procedure Rules are grossly incompetent plaintiff did not attach the objectors goods in execution of a decree. Plaintiff levied distress as a landlord against a tenant pursuant to section 3(1) of the Distress for Rent Act. Plaintiff in levying distress was exercising a statutory right as a landlord and not judgment debtors rights under a decree of the court. The applicants remedy lies under the distress for rent Act and not under the Civil Procedure Act or Rules……” The circumstances in this case are similar and I apply that passage Mutatis Mutandis to the application filed on 27.6.2002. Consequently I uphold the preliminary objection and strike out the application filed on 27.6.2002 for an order to lift the attachment with costs. E. M. Githinji JUDGE 7.11.2002

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.