REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MOMBASA CIVIL SUIT NO.432 OF 2001 KICONCO MONICA …………………………………... 1ST PLAINTIFF KEMIREMBE LOIS ……………………………………. 2ND PLAINTIFF VERSUS KISEGI AGENCIES LTD ………..……………………… DEFENDANT RULING The Applicants/Plaintiffs are not in Kenya under the jurisdiction of this Court. They apply that important documents relating to the ownership of certain vehicles listed in the application be released to them. The Respondents have objected to the application on the grounds that he has not been fully paid and he fears the Plaintiffs may not return to jurisdiction of this court. On perusing the affidavits on both sides and upon hearing of the arguments of counsel I am of the opinion that the Respondent must be paid in full before he is asked to part with the only security he now holds. In the circumstances the application is rejected and the same is dismissed with costs. Dated at Mombasa this 16th Day of April, 2002. J. KHAMINWA COMMISSIONER OF ASSIZE No appearance for Applicant or Respondent though have been notified. J. KHAMINWA COMMISSIONER OF ASSIZE
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.