Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Mohamud Mohamed v Republic

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROIB CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 167 OF 2003 From Original Conviction and sentence in Traffic Case No. 183 of 2003 of the Snr. Principal Magistrate’s Court at Kibera MOHAMUD MOHAMED……………………………………APPELLANT VERSUS REPUBLIC……………………………………………..……RESPONDENT JUDGMENT This appeal, is against sentence only. The two offences attract a fine in default imprisonment. The appellant should have been given an option of a fine before imprisonment. He has served one month and 10 days in prison. That is sufficient punishment. This appeal is allowed by reducing the sentence to the period already served such that the appellant shall be released forthwith unless otherwise lawfully held. Order accordingly. Dated and delivered at Nairobi this 31st day of March 2002 MBOGHOLI MSAGHA JUDGE

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.