Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

(org Pm’s Krg Cr. C. 257/02) Julius Muriuki Ndigoya v Republic

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NYERI HIGH COURT CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 231 OF 2002 (ORG PM’S KRG CR. C. 257/02) JULIUS MURIUKI NDIGOYA …………………………… APPELLANT VERSUS REPUBLIC ………………………………………………... RESPONDENT JUDGMENT The appellant JULIUS MURIUKI NDIGUYA was convicted by the principal magistrate Kerugoya on 2 charges:1. Apart causing actual bodily him c/s 251 of the Penal Code. 2. Malicious damage to property c/s 339 (1) of the Penal Code. On the first count he was sentenced to serve twelve (12) months imprisonment and on the second Count he was sentenced to serve six (6) months imprisonment. The sentences are to run consecutively. I have perused the proceedings recorded in the lower court. I found that the injuries sustained by the complainant (PW 1) were not conclusively and satisfactorily proved. Apart from stating that the appellant hit him on the head and chest PW 1 did not indicate the injuries he sustained and whether the same were visible tot he naked eye. The medical officer who filed the P3 form did not testify as a prosecution witness. The P3 form was produced by P.C. Paul Muthunia (PW4) of Kerugoya Police Station. No basis was laid for the production of that document by PW 4. He was not then ……….. . It was not indicated that he could interprete the observations noted in the P3 form. He simply produced the document. The production was irregular. The contents of the P3 form became hearsing and were admissible in evidence. Consequently the charge under S. 251 of the Penal Code was not proved. I quash the conviction thereon and set aside the sentence. As regards the second count there is ample evidence that the appellant tore the complainant’s shirt. The evidence of PW1, PW2 and PW3 was consistent and cogent. The appellant was properly convicted. The trial magistrate rightly rejected the appellants defence in that count. The appellant’s appeal is dismissed in respect to count 2. On the appeal against sentence, I note that the appellant is on record as a first offender. I allow the appeal against sentence. I set aside the sentence imposed and in its place order that the appellant pays a fine of Kshs.5000/- in default he will serve four (4) months imprisonment. Dated this 27th day of June 2002. J.K. MITEY JUDGE

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.