Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Martins Emeka Uzum & 1 other v Republic

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CRIMINAL DIVISION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.899 OF 2002 MARTINS EMEKA UZUM………………………………. APPLICANT VERSUS REPUBLIC ……………………………………………… RESPONDENT RULING The applicant who was represented by Mr. Kang’ahi applied for bail pending appeal which application was not opposed by Mr. Monda for the state, I have considered the application carefully. I have no reason to make me disagree with both Mr. Kang’ahi and Mr. Monda that the applicant should not be granted bond. I therefore allow this application. The applicant will be released on his own bond of Ksh.100,000/= one surety of the like amount (Kenyan surety) or continue serving the sentence. Order accordingly. R.M. MUTITU JUDGE 11/12/2002 Delivered in the presence of the applicant and Monda for the state. R.M. MUTITU JUDGE 11/12/2002

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.