REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI SUCCESSION CAUSE NO. 2750 OF 2001 IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF GERALD TINDI OTIENO (DECEASED) RULING This application seeks to strike out the objections filed by the father of the deceased 0n 19th December, 2001 on the grounds that no steps are taken by him to get the objection heard . It is also averred that the Applicant’s counsel has served the notice under Rule 17 (5) of the Probate and Administration Rules to the counsel of the objector and no response is made of that notice. However, I do note that there is no record of such notice having been either prepared or served.The Advocate of the Applicant has not filed any affidavit to support the averment. Surprisingly it is not even stated when and how such purported notice was sent. It is true that there is no response filed in response to the application or appearance was made by the counsel of the objector, at the time of hearing but that fact cannot entitle the applicant to get an order which is not justified. In absence of appropriate evidence of the notice under the Rules and its service the application dated 24th April, 2002 is dismissed. I do not make any order on costs. Dated and delivered at Nairobi this 20th day of May, 2002. K. H. RAWAL J U D G E.
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.