REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAROBI MISC. CIVIL CASE NO.1339 OF 2001 REPUBLIC ………………………………………………………APPLICANT THE PRINCPAL LANDS ADJUDICATION OFFICE … RESPONDENT AND THE CHIEF LANDS REGISTRAR ………………..…….. RESPONDENT THE DISTRICT LANDS REGISTRAR NAROK ………. RESPONDENT RULING It is clear from the material filed before me that there was no applicant or subject named. Indeed there was also no Respondent named. The application for leave was not properly drafted and the orders obtained based on the application have no relationship with the Notice of Motion before me. Applications for Judicial Review are brought to me undone of the Republic. The Respondent close decision is being challenged is indeed of the Respondent. The applicants controlling the name of the Republic are the subjects and the application is marked exparte, the subject or subjects. The application before me is curably defective. The preliminary objection is upheld. The application is struck out with costs to the Respondents and the interested parties. Dated at Nairobi at this 3rd July, 2002 D. R. RIMITA JUDGE
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.