Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

High Court 129 of 2002

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MOMBASA CRIMINAL CASE NO.27 OF 2001 REPUBLIC…………………………………………………..PROSECUTOR =V E R S U S= ALFRED MAVASI CHUPHI………………………………..…..ACCUSED COURT RULING The court cannot proceed because we have only two assessors available. A third assessor has never been selected. The second assessor was selected this morning. A third assessor could not be selected because potential people to select from did not turn up. I note that only two potential people were summoned to attend. From these two, we were to select two assessors. If one failed to turn up as happened herein this morning or if both attended and one was found unqualified to be an assessor, this court would end up where we are now i.e. unable to proceed because we are lacking assessors. This court summoned the Officer in the Registry in-charge of the issue of selection of assessors. The answer he gave was that he is unable to enlist a sufficient number of persons from whom to select. He appeared totally incapacitated. He did not even give us hope. It is this court’s view that this is a serious matter. In this case in particular, there are 8 witnesses present to give evidence and yet we cannot be able to proceed due to lack of assessors. I suggest that this matter should be given adequate attention. I suggest also that a more resourceful officer should be placed incharge of this matter at the Registry. Otherwise the court will again and again find itself in this kind of position in future. This should not be allowed to continue. ORDER These comments to be placed before the Chief Deputy Registrar of this court for her immediate attention and possible action. Dated at Mombasa this 6th day of March, 2002. D.A. ONYANCHA JUDGE

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.