REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT NAIROBI CIVIL SUIT NO. 2686 OF 1998 MEGTREND ENGINEERING & SUPPLIES LTD…………………...PLAINTIFF -VERSUSIDEAL OFFICE PRODUCTS LTD……………………….………1ST DEFENDANT LEVI O. OBONDO……………………………..…………………..2ND DEFENDANT RULING In this Application the applicant is asking for the Defence to be struck out as it amounts to a sham. In the Supporting Affidavit to this application in paragraphs 2 and 3, Mr. Dourado who is the Plaintiff’s Director depones that the sum claimed was for the payment of Computer sold to the Defendants. He further explains how the Defendant paid some of the money leaving the balance of the amount, subject of this suit. In the Defence, the 2nd Defendant denies that he was a guarantor to the 1st Defendant for the payment of the money and pleads that he is wrongly enjoined in the suit as a Defendant. I have studied the Agreement signed by the parties on 6th February, 1997 and its terms agree on what Plaintiff depones in his affidavit. There is no evidence that the Defendants complained about the goods sold to them. In paragraph 5 of the agreement it is stated that Mr. Levi O. Obondo being the Director of Ideal Office Products Limited guarantees the payment of the purchase price within one month if the 1st Defendant does not pay. The Defence in paragraph 2 and 5 put the Plaintiff on strict proof of the claim. The strict proof is the agreement which was signed by the parties. There is no counter claim by the Defendant. It follows therefore that the Defence does not raise any triable issues and the Plaintiff under these circumstances is entitled to a judgement. The Defence having been filed to simply delay the payment of the balance of the purchase money. The application is allowed. The Defence is struck out and judgement entered for the Plaintiff as prayed for in the plaint. The application shall have the cost of this application. Delivered and dated this 19th day of March, 2001 KASANGA MULWA JUDGE
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.