Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Kimble Securical Limited v Martin Omondi Opondo

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL APPEAL NO.480 OF 2000 KIMBLE SECURICAL LIMITED AND JAMES KIMBO ………………………………………….. … APPELLAMTS VERSUS MARTIN OMONDI OPONDO ……………………………………. RESPONDENTS RULING Having considered in the light of the submissions of the Learned Counsel 1. The application (notice of Motion|) dated 11/12/2000 filed on 14.12.2000 I find that the provision of O.III R.A was not complied with by the Appellants/Defendants Advocate. Consequently prayer sought in I is granted and 2 – costs. 2. It is ordered that the amount deposited in Court in pursuance of an ex-parte Order made on 7/12/2000 be released to the Plaintiff/Respondent. Orders accordingly. SHAIKH M. AMIN ............ JUDGE 23/10/2001

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.

Kimble Securical Limited v Martin Omondi Opondo — Original judgment | Caselaw