Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Appellant Side v Republic

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MOMBASA APPELLANT SIDE CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 203 of 2001 SAMINI SAMUEL NDUNDA ……… APPELLANT VERSUS REPUBLIC …………………………. RESPONDENT (From original conviction and sentence in Criminal Case no. 568 of 199 of the Senior Resident Magistrate Court at Kilifi – P. Mutani) JUDGMENT The appellant herein appeals against the sentence of 10 years and 10 strokes of the cane prescribed for robbery under Section 296 (1) of Penal Code. He pleaded guilty to robbing a tourist on 15.6.99 at about 5.30 p.m. at Mnarani Ruins. He had taken passport, camera, Binoculars, visa card, shs. 3000/- 200 US.dollars. The items were recovered by police . In mitigation the prosecutor informed the court that the appellant was a first offender. And he himself asked for leniency saying he was tempted by the devil. The maximum sentence imposed on this offence is imprisonment for 14 years together with corporal punishment not exceeding 28 strokes. For a first offender the punishment given is on the high side. The State Counsel was of the same view saying it was a simple robbery. It is necessary for court to consider the length of sentence when dealing with first offenders so as to give them opportunity to reform. I find that the trial magistrate did not consider the effect of the sentence on the appellant. I therefore find that the sentence imposed is harsh and excessive in the circumstances of this case. I set aside the sentence of 10 years imprisonment and substitute the same with a term of 4 ½ years imprisonment with 4 strokes of the cane. Dated this 6th November, 2001. J. KHAMINWA COMMISSIONER OF ASSIZE

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.