REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL CASE NO.1327 OF 1999 INDUSTRIAL DISTRIBUTORS LTD………………..….. PLAINTIFF VERSUS EXXADO PAINTS & ALLIED LTD…………………...…DEFENDANT ASK ME ENTERPRISES………..………………. OBJECTOR RULING In this application, the objector seeks that the attachment of the machineries pursuant to a decree in this case be raised or lifted as it had legal interests in them. The objector’s case is that it had hired those machines to the Defendant/Judgment-Debtor. The Hire Agreement did not specify the machinery that had been hired and it is unclear whether it was executed by the Defendant. It is also not registered. On these grounds, I agree with Mr. Mutinda for the Plaintiff/Judgment – Creditor that this objection has no basis and should be rejected. I, therefore, dismiss this application with costs. Dated and delivered at Nairobi this 22nd day of May, 2001. ALNASHIR VISRAM JUDGE
Original judgment
Industrial Distributors Ltd v Exxado Paints & Allied Ltd & 1 other
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.