REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL CASE NO. 2670 OF 1998 MARGARET W. WARIMA………………………………PLAINTIFF/RESPONDENT VERSUS PHYLLIS W. THEUIRU………………………….1ST DEFENDANT/APPLICANT HEZRON NDIRANGU……………………………2ND DEFENDANT/APPLICANT NAIROBI CITY CITY COUNCIL…………………3RD DEFENDANT/APPLICANT RULING On 14-12-99 the Court was moved to dismiss the suit for want of prosecution. As a result I dismissed the suit. The plaintiff has now come asking the court to review its orders with Mr. Muhindi for the applicant seeking to persuade the court that it was the mistake of the advocate for the plaintiff who failed to turn up in court. The advocate went on leave. He further argued that many of the steps necessary before setting down a suit for hearing had not been completed and so it was premature for the Defendant to have asked the case to be dismissed. In the greater interest of Justice I will review my order of 14.12.99. the said order is hereby set aside and the suit is reinstated. The plaintiff will however pay the costs occasioned by this application and these costs shall be paid before the case is heard. Dated and delivered this 14th day of March, 2000. KASANGA MULWA JUDGE
Original judgment
Margaret W. Warima v Phyllis W. Theuiru & 2 others
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.