REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MOMBASA CIVIL SUIT NO. 254 OF 1999 SOUTHERN CREDIT BANKING CORPORATION LTD. …………………. PALTINIFF VERSUS MUTOMO HARDWARE GENERAL STORES LTD. ……………………. DEFENDANT RULING There is no doubt that there is a claim for over 5 million shillings arising from a contract of Hire Purchase. The difference between the parties is on the amount due as the Defendant Claims the lorry the subject matter of the Hire purchase was sold but proceed never credited to their account while the Plaintiffs seek to prove otherwise. That is an issue of fact which may need to be resolved in evidence. As away of pleading, the defence has not ventilated much but at this stage the Respondent need only to show that he has a reasonable defence that merits court’s consideration. This is to be viewed against the background of the principle that whenever there is a triable issue, be it of law or facts Defendant ought to have liberty to be heard. The court also may give a conditional right to defence if there is a doubtful defence of a kind a shadowy\y defence. I have considered all this. I think I am persuaded to think there is issue of fact that need to go to trial. I dismiss the applicant. Cost in the cause. Dated this 14th Day of December, 2000. A.I. HAYANGA JUDGE
Original judgment
Southern Credit Banking Corporation Ltd. v Mutomo Hardware General Stores Ltd.
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.