REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI SUCCESSION CAUSE NO. 2593 OF 1996 IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF GEORGE NGUGI MUCHAI JOHN MUCHAI NGUGI...........................................................APPLICANT/OBJECTOR VERSUS MARGARET NGUGI..................................................1ST RESPONDENT PETER KARANJA KAMAU.....................................2ND RESPONDENT RULING This is an application to reinstate the application which was dismissed for want of attendance. I have gone through the affidavits sworn by the both parties. An application dismissed for non attendance is not decided on merit. The reasons given by the advocate for the applicant for not attendance together with the facts that this matter concerns the estate of a deceased person makes me believe that the parties should be able to be heard on merit. Accordingly the application is hereby reinstated for parties to take hearing dates in the registry but the applicants shall pay the costs of this application. Orders accordingly. Dated and delivered at Nairobi this 31st day of July, 1998 A . MBOGHOLI MSAGHA JUDGE
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.