REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL CASE NUMBER 101 OF 1996 FULCHAND MANEK & BROTHERS…………………………..………PLAINTIFF VERSUS BULLION BANK LIMITED……………………………………………….DEFENDANT RULING There being no denial by the Defendant/Respondent that the cheques on which the applicant’s account was debited did not belong to the plaintiff/applicant as deposed in paragraphs 5 – 9 of the affidavit in support of the application for summary judgment, I am of the view that the defence filed a hallow Sham in the nature of a red herring. Besides words and words, it discloses no bona fide triable issues. I accordingly enter Judgment as prayed in the sum of Ksh. 789,649/= plus costs and interest. The question of general damages is to be tried on vivo voce evidence at a date to be taken at the registry. Dated at Nairobi this 1st day of July 1996. A.G. RINGERA JUDGE
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.