REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MACHAKOS CRIMINAL APPEAL NO 256 OF 1986 MUTUKU………,……………….………APPELLANT V REPUBLIC…………………………………..RESPONDENT JUDGMENT The learned principal state counsel does not support the convictions for indecent assault contrary to section 133 (1) of the Penal Code and of malicious damage contrary to section 339 (1) of the said Code as both convictions are based on uncorroborated evidence of the prosecutrix whose evidence of how she reported to her parents at home is at variance with her father. Moreover from the judgment of the trial court it appears the magistrate shifted burden of proof on the appellant. The appeal is allowed. Convictions and sentences are quashed. Appellant be set at liberty forthwith unless otherwise lawfully held. March ABDULLAH 20, 1987 J
Original judgment
Appeal against convictions for indecent assault and malicious damage
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.