Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Muia v Republic

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MACHAKOS CRIMINAL APPEAL NO 262 OF 1987 MUIA………………..…….APPELLANT V REPUBLIC……………RESPONDENT JUDGMENT. The appellant was convicted for assault occasioning actual bodily harm and sentenced to imprisonment for 6 months and 2 strokes of the cane. The complainant and appellant appeared to have reconciled prior to the trial but his fact may not have been disclosed to the trial magistrate for purposes of dealing with the case under section 176 and 294 of the Criminal Procedure code. As the appellant pleaded guilty his conviction is upheld. As he had reconciled with the complainant prior to the trial that fact should initigate the sentence of the trial court, which sentence is therefore set aside. The appellant is discharged on condition that he commits no offence during the period of 12 months from to day. Order accordingly. December 14,1987 TORGBOR JUDGE

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.