Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Nganga v Republic

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI MILIMANI LAW COURTS CRIMINAL APPEAL NO 283 OF 1987 NGANGA……………………. APPELLANTS VERSUS REPUBLIC…………….…… RESPONDENT JUDGMENT September 1, 1987 Rauf J delivered the following Judgment. The appellant was convicted of assault contrary to section 251 of the Penal Code and sentenced to 18 month’s imprisonment on March 5, 1987. The incident took place on July 3, 1985 and it took over 18 months to complete the case. Mr Muchui relies on 6 grounds of appeal which are mainly based on evidence. As regards the magistrate’s lack of finding on the issue of the appellant’s credibility, I have noticed that she did fully consider the defence before convicting him which shows that she rejected the defence contention. The time factor has also no effect on the consideration of the evidence as a whole. Having gone through the records, I find that there is no substantial reason to upset the magistrate’s decision convicting the appellant. I dismiss the appeal against conviction. The appeal against sentence should be considered in the face of mitigating factors namely, the appellant’s belief, right or wrong, that the boys were stealing his sugarcane when it is realized that the parties were unknown to each other prior to this incident. Besides, the appellant was first offender. I think the sentence was excessively harsh. I, therefore, reduce it to 9 month’s imprisonment, thus allowing the appeal to that extent. September 1, 1987 RAUF JUDGE

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.