Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

keelrc-2026-02571

THE REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE EMPLOYMENT & LABOUR RELATIONS COURT AT NAIROBI MISCELLANEOUS NO. E342 OF 2026 PETER OLOO……………………………………………..………… APPLICANT VERSUS MEDSERV AFRICAN LIMITED…………………………….…... RESPONDENT RULING 1. I have considered the motion, the grounds and the affidavit in support together with the counsel’s oral submissions. Firstly, I note that the motion is not opposed. I further note that the Hon. Magistrate handling the matter did not strike it out on noticing that he did not have jurisdictions to entertain the same. 2. In light of the foregoing, I proceed to allow prayer Number 2 on the face of the application pursuant to Sections 1A, 1B, 3A and 18 of the Civil Procedure Act, and Articles 50 and 159 of the constitution. 3. It is so ordered. SIGNED, DATED, AND DELIVERED BY VIDEO-LINK AND IN COURT AT NAIROBI THIS 22ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026. C. N. BAARI 1 |RULING MISC. E342 OF 2026

page 1 of 2

JUDGE Appearance: Ms. Kwarikwar h/b for Mr. Achach for the Applicant No appearance Respondent Ms. Esther S -C/A 2 |RULING MISC. E342 OF 2026

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.