Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Ocharo v Anti – Female Genital Mutilation Board & 2 others; Salaries and Remuneration Commission & 21 others (Interested Parties) (Petition E189 of 2023) [2024] KEELRC 2436 (KLR)

Ocharo v Anti – Female Genital Mutilation Board & 2 others; Salaries and Remuneration Commission & 21 others (Interested Parties) (Petition E189 of 2023) [2024] KEELRC 2436 (KLR) (4 October 2024) (Judgment) Neutral citation: [2024] KEELRC 2436 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE EMPLOYMENT AND LABOUR RELATIONS COURT AT NAIROBI PETITION E189 OF 2023 J RIKA, J OCTOBER 4, 2024 BETWEEN MEMBA OCHARO ................................................................................. PETITIONER AND ANTI – FEMALE GENITAL MUTILATION BOARD .............. 1ST RESPONDENT STATE CORPORATIONS ADVISORY COMMITTEE ............ 2ND RESPONDENT THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL ...................................................... 3RD RESPONDENT AND SALARIES AND REMUNERATION COMMISSION ......... INTERESTED PARTY PETER NJAGE ......................................................................... INTERESTED PARTY ELIAS DULO ............................................................................ INTERESTED PARTY GEORGE MOGUSU ................................................................. INTERESTED PARTY CHRISTOPHER PETER ......................................................... INTERESTED PARTY MOSES MAINGI ...................................................................... INTERESTED PARTY JOHN MBUGUA ...................................................................... INTERESTED PARTY JOSEPHAT IRERI .................................................................... INTERESTED PARTY SALOME MUTIGA .................................................................. INTERESTED PARTY TERESIA MBARU ................................................................... INTERESTED PARTY TOM SIRAWA .......................................................................... INTERESTED PARTY LEAH MAINGI ......................................................................... INTERESTED PARTY SHEM OWALA ......................................................................... INTERESTED PARTY https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2024/2436/eng@2024-10-04 1

page 1 of 3

ANN MUTHINGANI .............................................................. INTERESTED PARTY MARTHA WANJUKI .............................................................. INTERESTED PARTY NIXON DARIA ........................................................................ INTERESTED PARTY FRED OWITI ............................................................................ INTERESTED PARTY EVERLYNE MUSYOKA .......................................................... INTERESTED PARTY PAUL SIRMA ............................................................................ INTERESTED PARTY JANE MWERERU .................................................................... INTERESTED PARTY CHRISTABEL ADHIAMBO ................................................... INTERESTED PARTY JULIUS MUSAU ....................................................................... INTERESTED PARTY JUDGMENT 1. The Petition herein, bears similar factual and legal background, as Petition E013 of 2021. 2. Petition E013 of 2021 was filed by the Petitioner, on behalf of 7 former Employees of the 1st Respondent Board. 3. The current 2nd to 22nd Interested Parties, were Co-Employees of the 2nd to 9th Interested Parties in the previous Petition. 4. It is not clear why they did not come to Court, when their colleagues did so, in the year 2021. 5. Their grievances against the 1st Respondent Board, are the same; the violations pleaded and the remedies claimed are the same; and these grievances were considered and determined by the Commission on Administrative Justice, in its Inquiry File FGM /012/423/2018. 6. There is a Judgment recorded under Petition Number E013 of 2021. The Court endorsed the findings of the Commission on Administrative Justice, in its Judgment. It has no reason to retry the facts, and to depart from the existing Judgment. It is ordered: a. Judgment in Petition Number E 013 of 2021 is adopted as the Judgment of the Court, in Petition E 189 of 2023. i. The findings of the Commission on Administrative Justice, in its Inquiry File FGM /012/423/2018, are adopted as the findings of the Court. ii. It is declared that the 1st Respondent violated the 2nd to 22nd Interested Parties’ constitutional and statutory rights under Articles 27, 41 and 236 of the Constitution, Section 4 of the Fair Administrative Action Act and Section 5 of the Employment Act. iii. The 1st Respondent shall pay to the 2nd to 22nd Interested Parties the difierence between the salaries paid in accordance with the 2nd Respondent’s Advisory, and those that should have been paid in accordance with the salary structure approved by the 1st Interested Party, over the period of deployment. https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2024/2436/eng@2024-10-04 2

page 2 of 3

iv. The 1st Respondent shall pay each of the 2nd to 22nd Interested Parties, general damages at Kshs. 300,000 each for violation of their constitutional and statutory rights identified in the Petition E013 of 2021. v. Costs to the 2nd to 22nd Interested Parties. vi. Interest granted at court rates from the date of Judgment, till payment is made in full. DATED, SIGNED AND RELEASED TO THE PARTIES ELECTRONICALLY, UNDER PRACTICE DIRECTION 6[2] OF THE ELECTRONIC CASE MANAGEMENT PRACTICE DIRECTIONS, 2020, THIS 4TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2024. James Rika Judge https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2024/2436/eng@2024-10-04 3

page 3 of 3

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.