REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE EMPLOYMENT AND LABOUR RELATIONS COURT AT NAIROBI CAUSE NUMBER 80 OF 2013 BETWEEN PATRICK OMUTIA ...............................................CLAIMANT VERSUS TELKOM KENYA LIMITED..............................RESPONDENT RULING 1. The Law Firm of Onindo Onindo and Associates, seeks, through its application dated 3 rd December 2020, to come on record for the Claimant, in place of the Law Firm of S. Musalia Mwenesi Advocates. 2. The application is opposed through the affidavit of Mr. Stephen Mwenesi, sworn on 4 th February 2021. The main ground in opposing the application, is that the Client, the Claimant herein, has not completed paying legal fees to his current Advocate. 3. The Court is persuaded that there is a mechanism, for the Law Firm of Mwenesi to recover any outstanding legal fees from the Claimant. The Claimant must not be denied his right of representation by an Advocate of his choice. IT IS ORDERED: a. The application filed by Onindo Onindo and Associates, dated 3rd December 2020 is allowed. b. No order on the costs. Dated and delivered at Nairobi, this 5th day of February, 2021. James Rika JUDGE
Original judgment
Patrick Omutia v Telkom Kenya Limited [2021] KEELRC 2148 (KLR)
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.