Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Joel Opumbi & 30 others v Devki Steel Mills Limited [2021] KEELRC 685 (KLR)

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE EMPLOYMENT AND LABOUR RELATIONS COURT AT KISUMU CAUSE NO. 1250 Of 2017 JOEL OPUMBI........................................................................................1 ST CLAIMANT JAMES KILONZO NZIOKI.................................................................2 ND CLAIMANT JAMES NZAU........................................................................................3RD CLAIMANT NICKSON OKUGA............................................................................... 4 TH CLAIMANT EVANS OCHEGO...................................................................................5 TH CLAIMANT MARIKO OTIENO............................................................................... 6 TH CLAIMANT DANCUN MUTUA MUIA................................................................... 7 TH CLAIMANT CHARLES KWENDO MASINDE.......................................................8 TH CLAIMANT JOSEPH MUTINDA MUTHIO..........................................................9 TH CLAIMANT WESTBURY MUKABWA.................................................................10 TH CLAIMANT GEOFFREY M. KATUMO...............................................................11 TH CLAIMANT MUTHIANI NDUTU........................................................................12 TH CLAIMANT ANTHONY KIOKO MITHWI........................................................ 13 TH CLAIMANT THOMAS KYALO WAEMA............................................................14 TH CLAIMANT JOHN MUTHIWA MUNYAO...........................................................15 TH CLAIMANT BONIFACE K. KIMONDIU.............................................................16 TH CLAIMANT THOMAS OSORO OMBOGI..........................................................17 TH CLAIMANT KEVIN OMWEBU OGEGA............................................................18 TH CLAIMANT ELIJAH OCHIENG NGESO..........................................................19 TH CLAIMANT MUTHAMA NZIOKA.....................................................................20 TH CLAIMANT PETER ONGAGA ASUGA..............................................................21 ST CLAIMANT DICKSON WAMBUA KALII.........................................................22 ND CLAIMANT

page 1 of 3

JOHN MWAURA KARIUKI.......................................................... 23 RD CLAIMANT NICHOLAS M. NDUNDA..............................................................24 TH CLAIMANT NICHOLAS M. MATHEKA..........................................................25 TH CLAIMANT AUGUSTINE S. OLUKA................................................................26 TH CLAIMANT BENSON O. LISA...........................................................................27 TH CLAIMANT ALFRED ONCHIRI....................................................................... 28 TH CLAIMANT BENJAMIN K. SAMMY...............................................................29 TH CLAIMANT OCHELE O. OSCAR....................................................................30 TH CLAIMANT WILLIAM WAMBUA..................................................................31 ST CLAIMANT VERSUS DEVKI STEEL MILLS LIMITED..................................................RESPONDENT RULING 1. The Claimant/Applicant in the application dated 12 th February, 2021 seeks to substitute the 28 th Claimant whose name had been erroneously duplicated as the 8 th claimant with one Alfred Onchiri whose name had erroneously been omitted due to counsel’s honest mistake. 2. Secondly, the claimant wishes to amend the memorandum of claim to bring to the attention of the Court material facts as per the draft Amended Memorandum of Claim. 3. Further, the claimant wishes to amend their tabulations in accordance with the Collective Bargaining Agreement which was not in their possession at the time of filing the claim as reflected in the annexed schedule to the draft Memorandum of Claim. 4. That the intended amendments do not alter the claimants’ suit to introduce a new one and are intended to help the Court determine the suit. 5. The application is supported on grounds set out on the face of the application and annexed supporting affidavit of the applicant. 6. The respondent opposes the application vide grounds of opposition duly filed in which it stated that the application is an abuse of Court process in that the application which is disguised as an application for amendment of pleadings is in reality an attempt to put on board Mr. Alfred Onchiri as a claimant in violation of Section 90 of the Employment Act, 2007 in that three (3) years period within which the said claimant would have lawfully filed his suit have lapsed. Thus the claim by the intended claimant is time barred and ought not to be admitted. 7. The respondent does not deal with the other amendments sought by the applicant in the Draft Amended Statement of Claim. 8. The suit was filed on 4 th July, 2017 and the cause of action derived from the statement of Claim is that the respondent unlawfully and unfairly terminated the employment of the claimants on various dates depicted in appendix ‘1’ to the claim in the year 2014. In terms of the said list, the intended claimant Alfred Onchiri is depicted as number 7 and is described as a Furnace Charger who was employed by the respondent on 26/4/2011 and his employment was terminated on 15/11/2014 and had served the respondent for three years. 9. It is evident from the Statement of Claim that Claimant number 8 Charles Kwendo Masinde had been duplicated as claimant number 28 and in the process, the advocate erroneously omitted to include the name of Alfred Onchiri on the face of the Statement of Claim. 10. However, the name of Alfred Onchiri was included in the attached list of claimants referenced in the Statement of Claim at paragraph 1. The paragraph states: - “The respondent wrongfully/unlawfully and/or unfairly terminated the claimants’ contract of employment on various dates as shown in Appendix 1 on allegation that the claimants had become redundant.’’ 11. A literal interpretation of paragraph 6 of the Statement of Claim read together with paragraph 1 clearly demonstrate that the claim by Alfred Onchiri was brought on board together with those of his colleagues on the date the suit was filed on 4 th July, 2017

page 2 of 3

12. The amendment sought to bring the name of the claimant on the first page of the Statement of Claim is in the Court’s view a mere formality intended to bring order and clarity to the proceedings. 13. The Court is satisfied that the error to exclude the name of the claimant on the first page and a repetition of the name of Charles Kwendo Masinde was an honest error by counsel which cannot suffice to exclude Mr. Alfred Onchiri from the temple of justice. 14. The Court finds that the intended amendment is merited and is granted. 15. There is no justification brought forth by the respondent to exclude the rest of the intended amendments. 16. Accordingly, the application dated 12 th February, 2021 is granted and the draft amended Statement of Claim deemed duly filed provided the applicant pays requisite Court fees. 17. Costs in the cause. DATED AND DELIVERED AT NAIROBI (VIRTUALLY) THIS 21ST DAY OF OCTOBER, 2021. MATHEWS N. NDUMA JUDGE. APPEARANCE MR. ONDIGI FOR CLAIMANTS/APPLICANT MR. K. MBERIA FOR RESPONDENTS EKALE – COURT ASSISTANT

page 3 of 3

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.