Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Murdock Owuor & 10 others (all suing as the proposers of the proposed Kenya Union of Technical and Vocational Education Trainers) v Registrar of Trade Unions & 3 others [2018] KEELRC 2159 (KLR)

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE EMPLOYMENT AND LABOUR RELATIONS COURT AT NAIROBI APPEAL UNDER SECTION 30 OF THE LABOUR RELATIONS ACT NO. 14 OF 2007 APPEAL NO. 26 OF 2016 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL OF THE DECISION OF THE REGISTRAR OF TRADE UNIONS MURDOCK OWUOR ARNOLD KEDENGE JAYNE N. EMISEMBE ZACHARY CHEBULOBI JOHN MUTHINI BEATRICE AYUMA JOHN MURAYA JAMES M. MUNYAO LEDIGU SEBASTIAN JOSEPHINE NYAKWACHI EMANUEL R. LOYAMORU’RO (all suing as the proposers of the proposed Kenya Union of Technical and Vocational Education Trainers)...............................................................APPELANTS v THE REGISTRAR OF TRADE UNIONS.....RESPONDENT SEBASTIAN LUDIGO..................1st INTERESTED PARTY KEPHAS OGUWI.........................2nd INTERESTED PARTY ELIZABETH CHEPTOO.............3rd INTERESTED PARTY DIRECTIONS SUO MOTO 1. On 13 March 2018, after highlighting of submissions, the Court reserved judgment to 4 May 2018. 2. In the course of preparing the judgment, the Court has noted several anomalies/failure to disclose relevant and material facts/documents on

page 1 of 2

the part of the Respondent that makes it impossible to do justice to the parties. 3. As an illustration, the Respondent admitted that it had issued a certificate of registration in respect of Kenya Union of Technical and Vocation Education Trainers to the Interested Parties. 4. There was no disclosure as to whether the Interested Parties were part of the promoters or those who made an application for the registration of the trade union. 5. Such disclosure, in the view of the Court goes to the root of the Appeal pending judgment herein. 6. The Court also notes that the Respondent did not attach a legible copy of what she referred to as ’’ENG 8’’ in her replying affidavit or a copy of the certificate issued. 7. The Court further notes that there is no evidence that the Interested Parties were served with the Amended Memorandum of Appeal. None of the parties drew the attention of the Court to this question. Whether this was deliberate or genuine mistake is at large. 8. Considering the foregoing, the Court on its own motion directs the Deputy Registrar to issue summons to the Appellants and Respondent to appear in Court on 11 April 2018 for appropriate directions. Issued and dated in open Court in Nairobi on this 6th day of April 2018. Radido Stephen Judge Court Assistant Lindsey

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.