keelrc-2018-01004

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE EMPLOYMENT AND LABOUR RELATIONS COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CAUSE NO 1396 OF 2016 JAMES MWIATHI KIMANDU....................................................CLAIMANT VERSUS LAUREN INTERNATIONAL FLOWERS LIMITED..........RESPONDENT JUDGEMENT 1.The claimant union sought the order of the court to set aside the conciliation agreement entered into on 7 th June, 2012 on the grounds that the same violated clauses 22 and 25 of the CBA hence invalid and proper. 2. According to the union, upon declaration of redundancy of their members they were to receive redundancy benefits as provided for under clause 22 of the CBA as well as gratuity as provided for under clause 25 of the CBA. 3. The respondent resisted the claim contending that the claimant and the respondent were involved and engaged in the resolution of the dispute from the onset and that the parties consequently entered into an agreement before the conciliator settling the dispute. According to the respondent therefore there existed no dispute between the claimant and the respondent. The respondent submitted further that the claimant could not resurrect the matter since it agreed through its representatives to sign an agreement thereby marking the matter as settled. The respodnent soguth reliance on the case of Mary Wairimu Gitonga & 29 Others Vs Ken Knit (Kenya) Ltd. 4. A CBA once concluded by the parties and registered by the court becomes part of the employee’s contract of employment. Section 3(6) of the Employment Act provides as follows: “Subject to the provisions of this Act, the terms and conditions of employment set out in this Act shall constitute minimum terms and conditions of employment of an employee and any agreement to relinquish vary or amend the terms herein set shall be null and void”. 5. In the above contract the conciliation agreement entered into between the claimant union and the respondent which sought to deprive the grievant of therein gratuity benefits constituted an agreement to relinquish or vary a more favourable term to the detriment of the claimants hence null and void to that extent. 6. The court therefore hereby orders that in addition to the redundancy benefits under clause 22 of the CBA, the grievants be paid their clause 25 dues as provided in the CBA. 7. It is so ordered. Dated at Nairobi this 5th day of October, 2018 Abuodha Jorum Nelson Judge Delivered this 5th day of October, 2018 Abuodha Jorum Nelson

page 1 of 2