Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Ndirangu Mwaura v Royal Media Srvices Ltd [2017] KEELRC 1504

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE EMPLOYMENT AND LABOUR RELATIONS COURT AT NAIROBI CAUSE NO. 1894 OF 2013 NDIRANGU MWAURA................................................CLAIMANT VERSUS ROYAL MEDIA SRVICES LTD............................RESPONDENT RULING 1. This Cause was filed on 26 November 2013 and a Response was filed on 4 February 2014. 2. The last time action was taken was on 20 April 2015 when directions were given. 3. On 8 March 2017, the Deputy Registrar issued a hearing notice for 4 April 2017. The notice was acknowledged by both parties. 4. When the Cause was called out initially, the Claimant was not present and Ms. Muhoro applied to have the Cause dismissed in the absence of the Claimant or his advocate. 5. The Court scheduled ruling for 6 April 2017 but after Ms Muhoro had left Mr. Murage for the Claimant appeared in Court and informed the Court that the Claimant had migrated to the United States of America 2 months ago and therefore he needed time to get in touch with him. 6. Mr. Murage did not explain why no attempt had been made for nearly 2 years when the Claimant was within jurisdiction of the Court to progress the Cause for hearing. 7. In view of the lack of diligence to progress the Cause, the Court orders the Cause dismissed with no order as to costs. Delivered, dated and signed in Nairobi on this 6th day of April 2017. Radido Stephen Judge Appearances For Claimant Mr. Murage instructed by Mugambi & Kariuki Co. Advocates For Respondent Ms. Muhoro instructed by Kamau Kuria & Co. Advocates Court Assistant Nixon

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.