REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE EMPLOYMENT AND LABOUR RELATIONS COURT AT NAIROBI CAUSE NO. 127 OF 2016 DOUGLAS MUDAVE LUSENO …………….……… CLAIMANT VERSUS MAASAI MARA UNIVERSITY …….……..….… RESPONDENT Mr. Ougo for claimant Mr. Maina for respondent RULING 1. The application dated 28th July, 2016 and filed on the even date was brought in the main to challenge the disciplinary process followed by the respondent in its conduct of a disciplinary hearing against the claimant. 2. At the time the suit was filed, the claimant/applicant was under suspension on ½ salary of Kshs. 151,447.50 per month. In terms of the Rules of Procedure at the University, the claimant was to be in suspension for a period not exceeding ninety (90) days i.e. between the months of February, March, April and May 2016. 3. The disciplinary process led to the dismissal of the claimant vide a letter dated 20 th June 2016 and delivered on 28th June 2016. 4. The claimant preferred an Appeal on 28th June 2016 challenging the disciplinary process because, it went beyond the mandatory ninety (90) days prescribed by the Rules. 5. It is the court’s considered view that, whether or not the termination of the employment of the claimant was lawful and fair is a matter to be determined upon hearing the suit on the merits. 6. The remedies sought in the application have been overtaken by events, and same is dismissed. 7. The main suit to take its normal course. Dated and delivered at Nairobi this 4th day of August, 2017 MATHEWS NDERI NDUMA PRINCIPAL JUDGE
Original judgment
Douglas Mudave Luseno v Maasai Mara University [2017] KEELRC 830
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.