REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE EMPLOYMENT AND LABOUR RELATIONS COURT AT NAIROBI CAUSE NO. 1391 OF 2014 PAUL KILONZO ………………………….….......…… CLAIMANT VERSUS SILPACK INDUSTRIES LTD .….………………… RESPONDENT Claimant in person Mr. Atonga for respondent RULING 1. The matter proceeded for hearing on 12 th July 2016 although the matter had been listed for hearing on the day. The record shows that the parties had on 4 th July 2016 agreed that the matter be mentioned before court on 12th July 2016 for setting of a hearing date. 2. The advocate for the respondent had asked for the file to be placed aside for him to come to court at 12.00 a.m. but he did not turn up. 3. It would appear that the court heard the matter in error on the day, the parties having obtained a mention date. 4. Accordingly, the judgment of the court delivered on 9 th September 2016 is set aside and the matter to proceed afresh. Dated and delivered at Nairobi this 28th day of July, 2017. MATHEWS NDERI NDUMA PRINCIPAL JUDGE
Original judgment
Paul Kilonzo v Silpack Industries Ltd [2017] KEELRC 817
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.