Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Rahab Wothaya Esiromo & 7 others v Blue Shield Insurance Company Limited & 2 others [2017] KEELRC 803

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE EMPLOYMENT AND LABOUR RELATIONS COURT AT NAIROBI CAUSE NO. 1488 OF 2010 RAHAB WOTHAYA ESIROMO JOSEPH KAMAU RUOYA SIMON MAINA CHEGE LABAN MWANGI CHEGE CLAIMANTS DAVID MUIRU NJOROGE MICHAEL GIKONYO KINYANJUI NOBERT OMANYO WABWIRE STEPHEN WAMBUGU WAWERU VERSUS BLUE SHIELD INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED ……………….……..................1ST RESPONDENT SHIELD ASSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED ………………………............. 2ND RESPONDENT STATUTORY MANAGER BLUE SHIELD INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED (UNDER STATUTORY MANAGEMENT)..........….. 3RD RESPONDENT M/S Wetende for applicant Mr. Karimi for respondent RULING

page 1 of 3

1. The notice of motion application dated 15th December 2016, seeks stay of execution of the Judgment of the Honourable Lady Justice Onyango delivered on 29th April 2013 on the grounds set out in the notice of motion to wit; on 9th December 2016, the court dismissed the applicant’s application seeking to stay execution of the Judgment of the Hon. Lady Justice Onyango J. on 29 th April 2013 on the grounds inter alia that in the said Judgment, the applicant was not released from the Judgment debt in its entirety. 2. The applicant has filed a notice of appeal against the Ruling of the Honourable Mr. Justice Nderi Nduma delivered on 9th December 2016. 3. That, the Appeal is arguable, and if execution is effected, the intended Appeal will be rendered nugatory. That the applicant has no knowledge of any assets owned by the Judgment debtor and would be unable to recover the decretal sum. 4. The applicant posits that there was no order by the court requiring it to settle the decretal sum and that the same was wrongly issued as there was no Judgment against the applicant to merit any attachment of its property as alleged or at all. 5. In my ruling of 9th December 2016 in which the court declined to grant stay of execution of the Judgment of Lady Justice Maureen Onyango delivered on 29 th April 2013, I made a finding of fact that my reading of the Judgment of Lady Justice Onyango did not absorb the 2 nd respondent from paying the debt in question and on that basis declined to grant stay of execution. 6. The applicant wants a second bite on the cherry and by doing so, seeks the court to sit on appeal on its own ruling dated 9th December 2016. 7. The claimants have been waiting to enjoy the fruits of their Judgment since 29 th April 2013 and in the court’s view, the balance of justice tilts in favour of dismissing the application, there being no tangible explanation as to why there has been such inordinate delay in prosecuting the pending Appeal against the Judgment of Onyango J. delivered on 29th April 2013. This second application for stay borders on vexatious and abuse of court process. 8. Accordingly, the application is dismissed with costs. Dated and Signed at Nairobi this 18th day of August, 2017. MATHEWS NDERI NDUMA PRINCIPAL JUDGE Dated, Delivered and Signed at Nairobi this 18th day of August, 2017. JORAM NELSON ABUODHA JUDGE Delivered in the presence of: ………………………………………….……………….. ……….……………………………….…………………. ………………………………………….………..………

page 2 of 3

…………………………………………….…………….. ………………………………………………….………..

page 3 of 3

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.