REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE EMPLOYMENT AND LABOUR RELATIONS COURT AT NAIROBI CAUSE NO. 811 OF 2012 LUCY NYANDIA MWANGI…..……………….......……..CLAIMANT VERSUS MATHENGE AND MUCHEMI ADVOCATES......1ST RESPONDENT VIRGINIA WANGUI MATHENGE……….......….2ND RESPONDENT Mr. Okongo for objector/applicant Mr. Lugano for claimant/respondent RULING Reasons For Ruling Delivered On 25th July 2017. 1. Judgment was given in this matter in favour of the 1 st respondent on 9th March 2013. The objector is the 2nd respondent, who is the wife of the deceased advocate Mr. G. K. Mathenge, the sole propriator of the 1st respondent. 2. It is not in dispute that the claimant has attached household items, which are personal properties of the objector who was merely an Administrator of the deceased. 3. It has not been demonstrated that those items form part of the estate of the 1 st respondent against whom judgment was entered. The objection was upheld and the attachment set aside on 25 th July 2017. Costs to follow the outcome. Dated, Signed and Delivered at Nairobi this 29th day of September 2017 MATHEWS NDERI NDUMA PRINCIPAL JUDGE
Original judgment
Lucy Nyandia Mwangi v Mathenge and Muchemi Advocates & another [2017] KEELRC 681
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.