Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Boniface Inondi Otieno v Mehta Electricals Ltd [2017] KEELRC 620

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE INDUSTRIAL COURT AT MOMBASA CAUSE NUMBER 290 OF 2013 BETWEEN BONIFACE INONDI OTIENO………...…. CLAIMANT VERSUS MEHTA ELECTRICALS LTD……….. RESPONDENT Rika J Court Assistant: Benjamin Kombe Claimant in Person No appearance for the Respondent ____________________________ RULING 1. In a Ruling dated 11th April 2014, the Court dismissed the Claim filed herein, on the ground that it was filed out of time. 2. In an Application dated 15th June 2017, the Claimant seeks to have the Court’s Ruling ‘declared null and void or a nullity.’ He argues that the decision (Radido J), was not sound in law, and it should be reviewed, set aside, and the dispute heard in full. 3. The Claimant made his arguments in Court on 26th July 2017. The Court Finds:4. There is no legal ground to interfere with the Ruling of 11th April 2014. 5. The Claimant’s Application is completely misconceived. 6. It is noted the Claimant has been to various Courts, filing all manner of Applications. 7. These multiple Applications could have the effect of the Claimant being declared a vexatious litigant. IT IS ORDERED:-

page 1 of 2

a. The Application dated 15th June 2017 is dismissed with no order on the costs. b. File closed. Dated and delivered at Mombasa this 23rd day of October 2017. James Rika Judge

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.