Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Aggrey Ajwang Juma v Kenya Railway Corporation [2016] KEELRC 316 (KLR)

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE EMPLOYMENT AND LABOUR RELATIONS COURT AT NAKURU PETITION NO. 22B OF 2016 IN THE MATTER OF ARTICLES 19, 20 & 41 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF KENYA IN THE MATTER OF THE KENYA RAILWAYS CORPORATION (PENSIONS) (INCREASE) (AMENDMENT) REGULATIONS 1988 IN THE MATTER OF THE KENYA RAILWAYS CORPORATION (PENSIONS) REGULATIONS IN THE MATTER OF THE KENYA RAILWAYS STAFF AND GENERAL NOTICE NO. 3 OF 2002 BETWEEN AGGREY AJWANG JUMA PETITIONER V KENYA RAILWAY CORPORATION RESPONDENT RULING 1. In a motion filed in Court on 12 August 2016, the Respondent seeks to have the Petition herein dismissed summarily on the ground of res judicata. 2. The Petitioner filed grounds of opposition to the motion on 14 September 2016, while the application was urged on 10 October 2016. 3. The Court has perused the Amended Plaint filed before the subordinate Court in Nakuru CMCC No. 2685 of 2003, Aggrey Ajwang Juma v Kenya Railways Corporation, where the cause of action arose from alleged unlawful interdiction and unlawful dismissal (after Petitioner had resigned), and seeking payment of full retirement benefits (lump sum payment, pension arrears, wages withheld during interdiction, leave allowance and travelling allowance). 4. In a judgment delivered on 12 June 2013, after hearing witnesses, the Court dismissed the suit on the basis that it was incompetent, having been commenced outside the 12 months allowed under section 87 of the Kenya Railways Corporation Act. 5. In the present Petition, the gravamen of the Petitioner’s case is violation of the rights to fair labour practices and fair administrative action, and failure to pay pension and retirement benefits. 6. In the Court’s considered view, the issues raised by the Petitioner herein are the same issues he

page 1 of 2

presented before the subordinate Court for determination, but repackaged as constitutional issues. 7. The present Cause is therefore res judicata. The Petitioner ought to have appealed against the judgment of the subordinate Court rather than to constitutionalise his cause of action, which is and was primarily a question of statutory application of entitlement to pensions and retirement benefits in case of resignation or dismissal under the Kenya Railways Corporation Act. 8. The Court in effect allows the motion and strikes out the Petition with no order as to costs. Delivered, dated and signed in Nakuru on this 18th day of November 2016. Radido Stephen Judge Appearances For Petitioner Ms. Mugweru instructed by Mugweru & Co. Advocates For Respondent Mr. Tombe instructed by Mukite Musangi & Co. Advocates Court Assistant Nixon/Daisy

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.