Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Mohamed Ali Gaal v Anwarali & Brothers Ltd [2015] KEELRC 400 (KLR)

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE EMPLOYMENT & LABOUR RELATIONS COURT AT MOMBASA CAUSE NO. 366 OF 2015 BETWEEN MOHAMED ALI GAAL…………..……………………….......................................... CLAIMANT VERSUS ANWARALI & BROTHERS LTD………….................................................... RESPONDENT Rika J. Court Assistant: Benjamin Kombe Mr. Oddiaga Advocate instructed by Stephen Oddiaga & Co. Advocates for the Claimant Ms. Opolo Advocate instructed by Federation of Kenya Employers for the Respondent ______________________________________________________________________________ ISSUE IN DISPUTE: UNFAIR AND UNLAWFUL TERMINATION AWARD [Rule 27[1][a] of the Industrial Court [Procedure] Rules 2010] 1. The Claimant filed his Statement of Claim on 28th May 2015. 2. The Respondent filed its Statement of Response on 29TH June 2015. 3. On 19th October, 2015 the Parties informed the Court they have settled the dispute on the following terms:a. By Consent judgment to be entered for Mohamed Ali Gaal the Claimant herein as follows:Compensation for unfair termination 11,395x5…………………………………………………………….Kshs. 56,040.00 Costs…………………………………………………………………Kshs. 100,000.00

page 1 of 2

Total Kshs. 156,040.00 b. Payment to be effected within thirty (30) days in default execution to issue. 4. The Court is satisfied the proposed terms of settlement are fair, adequate, regular and made in accordance with the Law. IT IS ORDERED:a. Award is entered in terms of the Parties’ proposal above. Dated and delivered at Mombasa this 19th day of October, 2015. James Rika Judge

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.