REPUBLIC OF KENYA Industrial Court of Kenya Cause 1323 of 2011 KENYA UNION OF COMMECIAL, FOOD AND ALLIED WORKERS...............................CLAIMANT VERSUS TRU FOODS LIMITED.................................................................................................RESPONDENT Rika J CC. Leah Muthaka Mr. Nyumba for the Claimant Mr. H. Okeche, instructed by Federation of Kenya Employers for the Respondent ISSUE IN DISPUTE: REDUNDANCY AWARD The parties have agreed on all issues upon conciliation, except the amount of ex-gratia payment to be paid to the employees exiting employment through redundancy. The employer has offered an ex gratia payment of Kshs.40,000, while the Union is demanding Kshs.800,000 for each employee. The Court notes this payment is over and above other redundancy payments that have been proposed pursuant to the parties’ CBA. A demand of Kshs.800,000 for each employee is not reasonable. This is more so considering that the employer has left open the possibility of re-engaging the employees on new contracts, as and when opportunities arise. There was an earlier agreement in respect of some of the affected employees, for payment of Kshs.40,000 ex gratia. It would seem to this Court that the offer of Kshs.40,000 in the present circumstances is fair and adequate. The Court upholds the offer of Kshs.40,000 in ex gratia made by the employer to the employees, over and above the other redundancy payments. The dispute is marked as settled and file closed upon these terms. Dated and delivered at Nairobi this 21st day of March 2013. James Rika Judge
Original judgment
KENYA UNION OF COMMECIAL, FOOD AND ALLIED WORKERS v TRU FOODS LIMITED [2013] KEELRC 461 (KLR)
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.